Staphylococcal biofilm: penetration and bioavailability of vancomycin with or without rifampin.

We measured antibiotic penetration and bioavailability in staphylococcus biofilms using simulated humanized concentrations of fluorescent vancomycin plus or minus rifampin. Vancomycin percent recovery across biofilm layers was:upper = 46%, middle = 40%, and lower = 33%. Vancomycin plus rifampin was not significantly different (P = 0.65). Addition of rifampin did not improve vancomycin penetration across biofilm layers.

Penicillin-Binding Proteins and Alternative Dual-Beta-Lactam Combinations for Serious Enterococcus faecalis Infections with Elevated Penicillin MICs.

Ampicillin-ceftriaxone has become a first-line therapy for Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. We characterized the penicillin-binding protein (PBP) profiles of various E. faecalis strains and tested for synergy to better inform beta-lactam options for the treatment of E. faecalis infections. We assessed the affinity of PBP2B from elevated-MIC strain E. faecalis LS4828 compared to type strain JH2-2 using the fluorescent beta-lactam Bocillin FL. We also characterized pbp4 and pbpA structures and PBP4 and PBP2B expression and used deletion and complementation studies to assess the impact of PBP2B on the levels of resistance. We tested penicillin-susceptible and -resistant E. faecalis isolates against ceftriaxone or ceftaroline combinations with other beta-lactams in 24-h time-kill studies. Two penicillin-susceptible strains (JH2-2 and L2052) had identical pbp sequences and similar PBP expression levels. One reduced-penicillin-susceptibility strain (L2068) had pbp sequences identical to those of the susceptible strains but expressed more PBP4. The second decreased-penicillin-susceptibility strain (LS4828) had amino acid substitutions in both PBP4 and PBP2B and expressed increased quantities of both proteins. PBP2B did not appear to contribute significantly to the elevated beta-lactam MICs. No synergy was demonstrable against the strains with both mutated PBPs and increased expression (L2068 and LS4828). Meropenem plus ceftriaxone or ertapenem plus ceftriaxone demonstrated the most consistent synergistic activity. PBP2B of strain LS4828 does not contribute significantly to reduced penicillin susceptibility. Neither the MIC nor the level of PBP expression correlated directly with the identified synergistic combinations when tested at static subinhibitory concentrations.

Meropenem plus Ceftaroline Is Active against Enterococcus faecalis in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model Using Humanized Dosing Simulations.

The standard of care for serious Enterococcus faecalis infections is ampicillin plus ceftriaxone. Ampicillin's inconvenient dosing schedule, drug instability, allergy potential, along with ceftriaxone's high risk for Clostridioides difficile infection and its promotion of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), led our team to explore alternative options. This work aimed to understand the role of carbapenems in combination with cephalosporins in these infections. We selected two ampicillin and penicillin susceptible E. faecalis strains (AMP-MIC 0.5-2 µg/mL; PCN-MIC 2 µg/mL) and simulated human therapeutic dosing regimens in a 48-h in vitro pharmacodynamic model (IVPD) with ampicillin (2g q4h), ertapenem (1g q24h), meropenem (2g q8h), ceftriaxone (2g q12h), and ceftaroline (600 mg q8h). As expected, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone demonstrated enhanced activity compared with ampicillin monotherapy with no MIC increases in either isolate. Meropenem and ceftaroline demonstrated significant kill against both isolates, with no regrowth or MIC increases occurring. Meropenem plus ceftriaxone also demonstrated significant kill, and while no MIC increases were identified for meropenem, there was minor regrowth and larger standard deviations. Ertapenem combined with either ceftriaxone or ceftaroline enhanced activity at 24 h, but at 48 h, regrowth occurred, and ertapenem MIC increases were noted. Meropenem-based combination therapy against E. faecalis may provide clinicians with another regimen to treat severe E. faecalis infections. Meropenem plus ceftaroline was as active as the standard of care treatment (ampicillin plus ceftriaxone) and may serve as an alternative for serious E. faecalis infections. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical efficacy.

Minocycline Alone and in Combination with Polymyxin B, Meropenem, and Sulbactam against Carbapenem-Susceptible and -Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model.

Acinetobacter baumannii is recognized as an urgent public health threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Current treatment options are scarce, particularly against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). We simulated the impact of minocycline standard (200 mg load + 100 mg Q12h) and high (700 mg load + 350 mg Q12h) doses, polymyxin B (2.5 mg/kg Q12h), sulbactam (1 g Q6h and 9 g/24 h as continuous infusion), and meropenem (intermittent 1 or 2 g Q8h and 6 g/24 h as continuous infusion) alone or in combination against CRAB and non-CRAB isolates by simulating human therapeutic dosing regimens in a 72-h, in vitro pharmacodynamic (IVPD) model. There were no monotherapy regimens that demonstrated bactericidal activity against the tested non-CRAB and CRAB strains. Resistance development was common in monotherapy regimens. Against the CRAB isolate, the triple combination of high-dose minocycline (fAUC/MIC 21.2), polymyxin B (fAUC/MIC 15.6), and continuous-infusion sulbactam (67% T>MIC) was the most consistently active regimen. Against non-CRAB, the triple therapy regimen of high-dose minocycline (fAUC/MIC 84.8) with continuous-infusion meropenem (100% T>MIC) and continuous-infusion sulbactam (83% T>MIC), as well as the double therapy of high-dose minocycline (fAUC/MIC 84.8) with continuous-infusion meropenem (100% T>MIC), resulted in persistently bactericidal activity. In conclusion, triple therapy with high-dose minocycline, continuous-infusion sulbactam, and polymyxin B produced the most significant kill against the carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, with no regrowth and minimal resistance development.

Weak biofilm formation among carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Biofilm formation of multidrug and extensively drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates is poorly understood. We investigated 139 diverse clinical K. pneumoniae isolates that possess various resistance patterns to evaluate the relationship between biofilm formation and resistance. Antimicrobial resistance was compared among a diverse collection of weak versus strong biofilm-forming K. pneumoniae, and predictors of strong biofilm formation were identified. Multi-drug resistant isolates were more common among weak (97.9%) versus strong biofilm formers (76%; P = 0.002). Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae were 91% less likely to form strong biofilm (odds ratio 0.09; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.33). The statistically significant inverse relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance suggests that virulence may be a trade-off for survival.

Biofilm prevention concentrations (BPC) of minocycline compared to polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin against Acinetobacter baumannii.

Infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii are difficult to treat as they are often multidrug resistant (MDR) and frequently form biofilms. We investigated the activities of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin against diverse Acinetobacter baumannii strains with biofilm formation classified as weak versus moderate/strong. At clinically achievable concentrations, minocycline prevented biofilm formation for 96% of isolates versus 54% for polymyxin B, 29% for meropenem and 29% for amikacin. Minocycline and polymyxin B demonstrated highest in vitro activity against A. baumannii and prevented biofilm formation for a majority of isolates.

Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors for Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus.

The molecular and clinical factors associated with biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are incompletely understood. Biofilm production for 182 MRSA isolates obtained from clinical culture sites (2004 to 2013) was quantified. Microbiological toxins, pigmentation, and genotypes were evaluated, and patient demographics were collected. Logistic regression was used to quantify the effect of strong biofilm production (versus weak biofilm production) on clinical outcomes and independent predictors of a strong biofilm. Of the isolates evaluated, 25.8% (47/182) produced strong biofilms and 40.7% (74/182) produced weak biofilms. Strong biofilm-producing isolates were more likely to be from multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clonal complex 8 (CC8) (34.0% versus 14.9%; P = 0.01) but less likely to be from MLST CC5 (48.9% versus 73.0%; P = 0.007). Predictors for strong biofilms were spa type t008 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 17.1) and receipt of chemotherapy or immunosuppressants in the previous 90 days (aOR, 33.6; 95% CI, 1.68 to 673). Conversely, patients with high serum creatinine concentrations (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72) or who previously received vancomycin (aOR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.39) were less likely to harbor strong biofilm-producing MRSA. Beta-toxin-producing isolates (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.89) and isolates with spa type t895 (aOR, 0.02 95% CI, <0.001 to 0.47) were less likely to produce strong biofilms. Patient outcomes also varied between the two groups. Specifically, patients with strong biofilm-forming MRSA were significantly more likely to be readmitted within 90 days (aOR, 5.43; 95% CI, 1.69 to 17.4) but tended to have decreased 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.06). Patients that harbored t008 and received immunosuppressants were more likely to have strong biofilm-producing MRSA isolates. Clinically, patients with strong biofilm-forming MRSA were less likely to die at 90 days but five times more likely to be readmitted.